Verizon commits more than $45 billion to 5G spectrum bid


On Wednesday, the Federal Communications Commission announced the winners of an $81 billion auction for the license to use important airwaves that are ideal for 5G.

The big winners were Verizon and AT&T, which need these airwaves in order to build 5G networks that are significantly faster than current wireless service.

Verizon, through its Cellco Partnership subsidiary, bid nearly $45.5 billion on the airwaves. AT&T, through AT&T Spectrum Frontiers, bid $23.4 billion. The third-largest U.S. carrier, T-Mobile, bid the third largest amount of money on the spectrum at $9.3 billion.

The sums spent by the companies ended up much higher than expectations for the auction last summer, which reflects how important securing licenses for the airwaves are for the carriers.

“These record-breaking results highlight the demand and critical need for more licensed mid-band spectrum and demonstrate the importance of developing a robust spectrum auction pipeline,” said CTIA CEO Meredith Baker in a statment. CTIA is a trade group that represents the wireless industry. Bidders are still under a quiet period where they are not permitted to publicly comment.

The 280 megahertz of spectrum up for grabs in this auction is mid-band spectrum, sometimes called the “goldilocks band,” which means that it’s well suited for 5G networks, combing both the ability to transmit huge amounts of data with a wavelength that can travel distances.

The results are in-line with previous industry expectations. Verizon and AT&T were expected to be the biggest bidders, because they did not have a lot of mid-band spectrum. T-Mobile had already acquired some mid-band through its merger with Sprint.

Not all the spectrum was sold at once. The 280 MHz of spectrum was split into smaller 20 MHz blocks, and further divided into 406 geographic regions. All together, there were 5,684 licenses up for grabs.

In total, the three biggest U.S. carriers won 90% of the licenses up for auction.

Here are the top five bidders, according to the FCC:

  • Cellco Partnership: $45,454,843,197
  • AT&T Spectrum Frontiers LLC: $23,406,860,839
  • T-Mobile License LLC: $9,336,125,147
  • United States Cellular Corporation :$1,282,641,542
  • NewLevel II, L.P.: $1,277,395,688

The top five bidders by number of licenses granted were:

  • Cellco Partnership: 3,511
  • AT&T Spectrum Frontiers LLC: 1,621
  • United States Cellular Corp.: 254
  • T-Mobile License LLC: 142
  • Canopy Spectrum, LLC: 84

 U.S. Cellular is the fourth-largest U.S. carrier. NewLevel II represents private equity firm Grain Management, while Canopy Spectrum is a venture between former Wells Fargo analyst Jennifer Fritzsche investor and Edward Moise Jr., according to LightReading.

Thank you for spending your time with us on My Local Pages. We hope you enjoyed checking out this news update about the latest World Business news items published as “Verizon commits more than $45 billion to 5G spectrum bid”. This story is brought to you by MyLocalPages Australia as part of our news aggregator services.

#Verizon #commits #billion #spectrum #bid



Source link

Boeing faces another bumpy ride to regain trust


Filings also allege Boeing did not order an immediate investigation into the MCAS control system on the 737 Max which has been blamed for the crashes, despite the Federal Aviation Administration warning it “posed an unacceptably high risk of catastrophic failure”. After a second 737 Max operated by Ethiopian Airlines went down near Addis Ababa in March 2019, aviation regulators around the world were quick to ground the jet.

However, the FAA was slower to act, and Boeing only recommended grounding the jet several days later, saying that after consulting with the FAA and National Transportation Safety Board it had decided to take it out of service “out of an abundance of caution and in order to reassure the flying public of the aircraft’s safety”.

Loading

The 737 Max remained grounded until last month. After extensive investigations into the crashes, modifications and extra pilot training, the jet was cleared to fly again. Boeing’s response to the fresh crisis may show it has learned lessons but all that work could be threatened by the latest in-flight emergency.

“Until recently, the general public only knew two aircraft in civil aviation history: Concorde and the 747 Jumbo Jet,” says Marc Szepan, lecturer at the University of Oxford Saïd Business School. “The Max changed all that.”

He adds that Boeing’s fast response to grounding 777s fitted with the Pratt & Whitney 4000-112 engine that failed on the United Airlines flight means it is “showing the ultimate constructive compliance to regulators”.

Management will be doing all they can to “prevent the significant level of concern over the Max spreading to become a general concern about Boeing products”, adds Szepan.

It might not be enough, according to Alastair Pickering, co-founder of stakeholder intelligence business Alva. “This latest incident threatens to undermine the reputational recovery work that Boeing has undertaken,” he says. “That it is safety-related will also revive and reinforce existing stakeholder concerns over the company’s reputation in this department, which had shown signs of improvement.”

“There’s a saying in aviation that ‘aerospace companies sell thrust, but airlines buy trust’. That’s never been more significant for Boeing now.”

Marc Szepan, lecturer at the University of Oxford Saïd Business School

Piling further pressure on Boeing is that its new version of the 777, the larger 777X, is likely to be years late coming into service after developmental problems. If the investigation into the latest incident unearths further concerns about Boeing, the 777X could find itself less attractive to airlines. That would boost arch rival Airbus.

For all the concerns about Boeing, the business that should be under scrutiny is Raytheon, the US company that makes Pratt & Whitney engines. Early indications are that the problem was with the blades inside the engine, with some reports that they may have had fractures that caused them to fail.

Whether this is a design issue or maintenance flaw will almost certainly be revealed by the investigation, but that could take months.

Loading

That the problem is with the engine and not the design of the aircraft itself will come as some relief to Boeing.

Of more than 1600 777s the company has produced, relatively few – just 128 – have the Pratt & Whitney 4000-112, with most powered by GE and Rolls-Royce engines, according to travel data and analytics firm Cirium.

The Pratt & Whitney engine is not a new product either, effectively being in the “sunset” of its life. But there is still plenty of life in the existing 777, meaning Pratt & Whitney could face a hefty bill if the issues prove to be endemic. This could happen. The weekend’s incident was the third time in three years a 777 with the engine type has suffered a failure.

It’s not just the 777 that is affected. The Pratt & Whitney 4000 family is fitted to almost 800 passenger and cargo aircraft, and another also suffered an incident at the weekend. An engine on a 30-year-old Boeing 747 freighter failed on take-off in the Netherlands. Luckily, such incidents are rare. “Think of the millions of hours of flights without anything happening,” says John Strickland, of aviation consultancy JLS. “To have two engine failures in one weekend is just an incredibly random coincidence.”

Rare as they might be, for passengers hoping to return to the skies in a post-pandemic era when travel restrictions ease, it’s just another worry. “There’s a saying in aviation that ‘aerospace companies sell thrust, but airlines buy trust’,” says Szepan. “That’s never been more significant for Boeing now.”

Telegraph, London

Business Briefing

Start the day with major stories, exclusive coverage and expert opinion from our leading business journalists delivered to your inbox. Sign up for the Herald‘s here and The Age‘s here.

Most Viewed in Business

Loading

Thank you for dropping in to My Local Pages and seeing this article regarding Australian business called “Boeing faces another bumpy ride to regain trust”. This news update was shared by My Local Pages Australia as part of our international, national and local news services.

#Boeing #faces #bumpy #ride #regain #trust



Source link

BGC heirs fighting over $115m




The Supreme Court has delivered a tactical win to the widow of the late Len Buckeridge as she fights his sons over the carve-up of the magnate’s estate.

Thank you for reading this news release about Australian Business news published as “BGC heirs fighting over $115m”. This story was posted by MyLocalPages as part of our local and national news services.

#BGC #heirs #fighting #115m



Source link

Heathrow passenger numbers fall to 1970s' levels



Covid “devastated” air travel in 2020, the UK’s largest airport says, as it sinks to a £2bn loss.

Thank you for dropping by My Local Pages and checking out this news article regarding InterInternational and World Business news and updates named “Heathrow passenger numbers fall to 1970s' levels”. This news update was shared by MyLocalPages Australia as part of our local and national news services.

#Heathrow #passenger #numbers #fall #1970s039 #levels



Source link

How to get clients to pay their invoices


It can be quite the tight-rope act: Getting
clients on your side, earning their trust and aligning yourself with their
needs and their challenges. Then, sending an invoice and following up on that
payment request. Perhaps another reminder…until it starts to feel awkward
because the friendly relationship is becoming strained. How can you get clients
to honour their payment commitments while you stay the good guy? Here are five
tips to get clients to their invoices faster.

1. Cultivate a personalised relationship
with your clients

A personalised relationship with your clients
creates a pleasant working atmosphere and helps to ensure you retain your
clients. It also creates the correct environment for accountability. Where
there’s a relationship there’s greater pressure to pay because the client feels
their personal reputation on the line. It also makes it easier to start that
conversation around a payment that’s due.

2. Direct your invoices to the
correct recipient

It sounds obvious, but this is where a
significant hold up can take place. When the invoice arrives in the wrong inbox
it can slowly gather dust there until you start to send reminders. Before you
know it, tensions build up unnecessarily and you find yourself being passed
from department to department before finally reaching the relevant person and
then waiting for your invoice to go through due processes before being approved
and paid. Save time by asking your clients from the beginning for the contact
details of the correct person to handle correspondences around invoices and
payments.

3. Clearly communicate payment terms
when the initial quote is approved

Once you’ve on-boarded a new client and they

approve their initial quote, ensure they sign an agreement that clearly states
your payment terms. Include payment due dates, request any upfront payments
necessary, payment options, as well as discounts or added charges based on
early or late payments. It is imperative that this is clearly written and not
in fine print. During a face-face or telephonic meeting, repeat it verbally to
ensure it is acknowledged, not just on paper for the sake of legality, but make
sure it is understood and consented to. 

4. Simplify your payment methods

Creating a new payment beneficiary or hunting down your banking details can lead to delays in receiving your payments. It’s not because your client doesn’t want to pay you, rather, it is a time-consuming task. Similarly, make sure your invoices are easy to see and understand instantly. Offer a variety of payment methods to make it easier for your clients. A simple payment procedure has proven to be one of the most effective ways to secure timely payment.

5. Outsource a debtors service for
the dirty work

There are fantastic services out there that are similar to a debtor’s service. A monthly premium affords your business a guarantee that the external service-provider will pursue unpaid debts on your behalf and have them settled, legally. Not only does it remove the heavy-lifting and resource-intensive work (like making phone calls), it keeps your brand being the “good guy” because you’re essentially never in a position to make those awkward phone calls requesting payment.

Sonia Gibson, Founding Director, Accounting Heart Chartered Accountants



Thank you for visiting My Local Pages. We hope you enjoyed seeing this news update involving the latest Australian Business News items called “How to get clients to pay their invoices”. This news article is presented by My Local Pages as part of our national news services.

#clients #pay #invoices



Source link

Where are the checks, Joe?



The Democrats have a lot of good excuses to explain why they have not yet delivered a third round of COVID-19 stimulus checks.

It’s only been a month. The Republicans haven’t cooperated. The previous president required some seeing-to.

Unfortunately, desperate Americans can’t feed their kids with excuses.

Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi appears to grasp this concept, if mostly while taking digs at her colleagues across the aisle. As bipartisan talks around a proposed $1.9 trillion stimulus package collapsed recently, Pelosi declared, “Americans need help. House Republicans don’t care.”

But Democrats have not yet effectively demonstrated that they care either.

They surely feel obligated to help, whether out of the kindness of their hearts or because it’s part of the brand they’ve cultivated over the years. Caring, however, might be a stretch.

If the Dems truly cared, they’d betray more understanding of the urgency shared among the eight million Americans who fell into poverty between June and November, let alone the millions more dangling over the precipice of the abyss. Many of those who lost jobs during the pandemic are currently struggling to stay healthy and sane and find a way to put food on the table in a weak job market. Their bank accounts are almost entirely eroded. They can’t afford to feed their pets. Every day, they wake up to the deepest trouble of their lives.

This isn’t a situation where American families could sure use some extra money. It’s a situation where many of them are a single unpaid bill away from going unhoused—and begging the government to throw them a lifeline.

It was amid this sorry state of affairs that President Joe Biden promised, on January 3, that if Georgians voted for Democratic Senate candidates Jon Ossoff and Raphael Warnock in that week’s special election, $2,000 stimulus checks would “go out the door immediately.”

Political scientists could spend years dissecting the direct impact of this concrete promise on the outcome of that election. It was a unique situation. After a year in which Republicans seemed to force Democrats into whittling their ambitious, if possibly pork-riddled $3.4 trillion surplus package down to the $2.2 trillion HEROES Act, which ultimately fizzled out in favor of a $900 billion relief bill with a paltry $600 direct payment, here was an opportunity to completely remove Republicans from the stimulus equation.

There’s little doubt that Biden’s explicit promise to end the gridlock helped put Ossoff and Warnock over the top. Imagine the relief among those who need help the most, upon hearing that no more impediments stood in the way between them and a potentially life-changing amount of money!

Now imagine how quickly that relief curdled into disappointment when reality settled in.

As it turned out, rather than the promised $2,000, the stimulus checks would actually amount to $1,400, and rather than “immediately,” they would arrive vaguely soon-ish. (The current earliest estimate is mid-March.)

How could this be happening? Do the Democrats, those standard-bearers of caring, not currently control both houses of the legislature as well as the executive branch of the U.S. government?

The logic around $1,400 is baffling, for starters. Of all the moving parts in a stimulus package that could possibly use a bonsai trim, direct payments are low, if not last, on the list. The idea is ostensibly that the $1,400 would piggyback on top of December’s $600 payment to form the requisite $2,000. It’s bait-and-switch math that appears technically accurate if you squint at it—but only if the checks arrived very shortly after the first batch, rather than at least two and a half months later.

Besides, there is nothing to be gained from this kind of penny-pinching right now, especially when other countries such as Canada are paying citizens that same $2,000 every month to stay home. This is a pandemic, and money isn’t real. This isn’t the time for wasting precious days targeting payments. It’s the time to focus on the survival of millions of Americans at a time when 500,000 have already died from COVID-19 itself.

Any lawmaker whose fear of impoverished people not getting money they need is dwarfed by a fear of people who are not impoverished getting money they don’t need is probably a sociopath and should not be making laws.

Part of the reason the bill has ultimately taken so long—and part of the reason the direct payments are so modest—is because Biden and the Dems hoped to pass COVID-19 relief with bipartisan support. Not only would inviting Republicans to the table in good faith offer up some of that unity Biden campaigned on, but it would also speed up the deal, as the only alternative with such a slim Senate margin—passing the bill through budget reconciliation—is a longer, more complicated process than a floor vote.

However, it’s been clear for at least a month now that Republicans will not be wooed by the temptation of helping President Joe Biden get a win, no matter how many needlessly suffering individuals would also get a win from it. (Read: survive.) Even the most moderate of Republicans seems bewildered by the proposed bill.

The moment that it became clear that even Senator Collins seemed beyond reach, back in January, the freshly sworn-in Biden should have focused on the task of whipping the most conservative Democratic Senator, Joe Manchin. (He was officially on board as of February 2.)

As we head into late February of 2021, the Democrats finally appear on the brink of approving a stimulus package, and with it a third round of checks. Beyond direct payments, the proposed bill would renew federal unemployment benefits, increase funds for distributing COVID-19 vaccines, and possibly increase the minimum wage to $15 per hour and unload some student loan debt. It’s a bold, muscular bill that enjoys broad bipartisan support from the American public.

But seriously, where are the damn checks already?

Is this really the foot the Biden administration wants to put forward walking into this term? Sure, it’s only been a month, but that recency is dwindling by the minute. The people who have lost their livelihood through no fault of their own and are struggling for subsistence after only receiving a grand total of $1,800 from the government during the pandemic—those people can’t be expected to wait until mid-March. I’m not even sure what waiting is supposed to look like when one’s best option for getting by is starting a GoFundMe.

Mid-March may seem soon enough for most politicians, but those barely scraping by are bound to feel the edge of every single second of it.

If Democrats aren’t afraid of putting those people through such an experience, they should at least be afraid of how long those people will remember that it happened.



Thank you for spending your time with us on My Local Pages. We hope you enjoyed seeing this story regarding the latest World Business News items titled “Where are the checks, Joe?”. This article was posted by MyLocalPages as part of our local and national news services.

#checks #Joe



Source link

Climate crisis bigger concern than pandemic for Australian businesses, survey finds | Business


Australian bosses say the climate crisis is the biggest challenge facing their businesses – in contrast to their overseas counterparts, who have ranked recovering from the Covid-19 pandemic their top concern.

“Climate change impacts” were rated the No 1 concern by 18% of 155 Australian executives surveyed by accounting firm Ernst & Young, followed by technological disruption (17%) and “the continuing Covid-19 pandemic” (15%).

Globally, the positions of climate change and the pandemic were reversed, with the pandemic considered the biggest challenge by 18%, the economy second with 12% and global heating a distant third at just 9%.

“We think this reflects both the fact that locally the pandemic has been handled comparatively well and also our C-suite consider Covid’s impacts to be short term,” EY’s managing director of strategy and transactions, David Larocca, said.

“It also reflects the priority position investors are now giving sustainability and climate change when making their decisions.”

Over the past few years investors, including large superannuation funds, have ramped up pressure on boards and executives to commit the companies they lead to cut greenhouse gas emissions.

In response to investor pressure, Australia’s two big miners, BHP and Rio Tinto, have said they will attempt to reduce their emissions to net zero by 2050, while major banks ANZ and NAB have committed to reducing or eliminating their funding for coal projects.

The election of Joe Biden has also increased pressure on Australia and its corporate sector to do more on climate.

Biden has recommitted the US to the Paris agreement, which aims to limit global heating to 1.5c by 2050, and his environmental envoy, John Kerry, has said that the two countries are not on the same page and “coal has got to phase down faster”.

Mathew Nelson, a climate change and sustainability executive at EY, said that despite the progress made so far, there was “still a long way to go to educate Australian corporates about the opportunities associated with achieving net zero emissions”.

“While the market is increasingly alert to the economic upsides of decarbonisation, in the near term Australian businesses are acknowledging that the economic reorganisation required to achieve net zero will create losers as well as winners, and time is running out to ensure you are the latter.”

He said EY research also showed that investors were increasingly happy with the quality of the data companies gave them on their climate performance, “despite an increasing demand to understand climate risks in portfolios and companies”.

“This mismatch should be priority number one for the capital markets ecosystem in the years ahead,” he said.

The EY survey, conducted as part of its annual capital confidence barometer, received responses from 155 Australian executives and 2,515 globally.

Thank you for spending your time with us on My Local Pages. We hope you enjoyed checking this news release about local business titled “Climate crisis bigger concern than pandemic for Australian businesses, survey finds | Business”. This news release was posted by MyLocalPages as part of our international, national and local news services.

#Climate #crisis #bigger #concern #pandemic #Australian #businesses #survey #finds #Business



Source link

I’m 28, have no debt, 401(k), Roth IRA and $45K. My parents want me to save for a home. I want a Tesla Model 3. Who’s right?


Dear Quentin,

I’ve been flip-flopping back and forth between buying a new car or putting a down payment on my first home. With my parents being very money-minded and keeping a careful eye on my finances (still), I’m caught in a predicament.

The original plan was to save up 20% to 30% for a down payment on a condo in the suburbs of Los Angeles and buy into the market within the two years or so, and right now I’m about 40% towards that goal.

However, with the Green Act possibly on the horizon again, the Model 3 has been a temptation, especially with all the extra bonus incentives my state offers, with a net final price of around $27,000. I’m not desperately in need of a new car, but this seems like a great way to save some money on a vehicle with smart features.


With the Green Act possibly on the horizon again, the Model 3 has been a temptation, especially with all the extra bonus incentives my state offers.

I am 28 years old with zero debt as of January 2021. Retirement wise, I am well on my way to maxing out 401(k) contributions this year, and I have already maxed out my Roth IRA contributions, and if everything stays the same, I’ll have about $60,000 in retirement by the end of the year.

In terms of liquid assets and investments, I’m sitting on about $45,000 as of right now. I currently save and/or invest 50% to 60% of my take-home pay, since I moved back home with my parents after being laid off last year, and started a new job remotely.

I don’t know if I should (a) purchase the car straight up and empty out my savings as I will probably have the time to save up the money again before a potential housing crash, (b) not purchase the car and keep saving for the down payment, (c) do both or (d) invest the money elsewhere.

As financial conservatives, my parents are strongly against me buying the car because it’s a depreciating asset, and they believe entering the market should be my priority, so they think that I should have the down payment waiting, to jump into the market whenever I see a good deal.

I believe I can buy the car and strap down, and save more aggressively to replenish the funds. Any advice for me?

Pressured by the Parents

You can email The Moneyist with any financial and ethical questions related to coronavirus at qfottrell@marketwatch.com

Dear Pressured,

What the hell! Give into your impulse, splash out on the Tesla
TSLA,
-2.19%
Model 3. You will be empowered by the knowledge that you are using your spending power to get America back on its feet, while making a cool statement that you have finally arrived. Fully embrace the American dream of being smack-bang-wallop in the middle of the eco-warrior, Tesla-driving, tech-savvy zeitgeist. All any of us have is today, after all and global warming is coming for us all in the end.

Cruise the neighborhoods where you would like to buy a home in your 30s, 40s or 50s (it will all depend on how the property market fares between now and then). Take a good look at those homes, assuming they are not obscured by manicured hedges, and enjoy the view. Drive back to your parents’ house, honk the horn so they can marvel at Elon Musk’s bold vision for themselves, and then and only then ask them nicely if they would make space in their driveway for your Model 3.

I am kidding, of course. You have done everything right so far. Buy the house first and the $27,000 electric car later. You already have a destination in mind. Don’t allow an automobile, regardless of how cool you think it would be to drive, to deter you from that destination. Listen to your parents. They have seen more than you have. They are trying to set you on the road to financial freedom. And as nice as they are to drive and to be seen driving, you don’t need a Tesla to achieve that.

The Moneyist:‘Warren Buffett and Harry Potter couldn’t get those two retired early’: Our spendthrift neighbors said our adviser was ‘lousy.’ So how come WE retired early?

Hello there, MarketWatchers. Check out the Moneyist private Facebook
FB,
+2.12%
 group where we look for answers to life’s thorniest money issues. Readers write in to me with all sorts of dilemmas. Post your questions, tell me what you want to know more about, or weigh in on the latest Moneyist columns.

Thank you for dropping in and seeing this news article involving World Business news called “I’m 28, have no debt, 401(k), Roth IRA and $45K. My parents want me to save for a home. I want a Tesla Model 3. Who’s right?”. This post was presented by My Local Pages as part of our national news services.

#debt #401k #Roth #IRA #45K #parents #save #home #Tesla #Model #Whos



Source link

2021 holds promise for small businesses – capitalise on it with compelling content


Let’s just say 2021 may not entirely be the new start many of us were hoping for. But vaccine rollouts on the horizon aren’t the only reason for small businesses to feel optimistic.

In reality, this year can be a fantastic opportunity for many small businesses. Many Aussies realise that small businesses have been through the wringer in 2020 – and they want to do their bit to support the sector.

This creates an opening for small businesses across Australia to broaden their customer base and offset some of the losses caused by 2020’s lockdowns. With the pandemic continuing through 2021, our reliance and support for our communities will continue to prevail.

For those small businesses looking to make the most of this opportunity, here are three key considerations to keep in mind in 2021:

The value of video

Gotten to know Netflix on a deeper level during the pandemic? You’re not alone. By bringing more video into your marketing materials, you can more easily grab potential customers’ attention and keep them engaged.

Next step: Think about where video might be more effective than images to communicate your key messages for the year. If you find gaps in your content library, consider how you could fill them with stock footage or repurpose footage you already have.

Dive into diversity and sustainability

Between ongoing economic uncertainty and consumers bombarded by more digital media ever – up 19 per cent in 2020 – it’s an especially crucial year for businesses to get visual communication right if they want to stand out.

Our Visual GPS research suggests that while four in five consumers say they expect brands to be consistently committed to diversity and inclusion, only half of them feel accurately represented. Nearly 80 per cent of ANZ consumers feel companies need to do a better job at capturing the true lifestyles and cultures of diverse people, including those of different ethnicities, abilities and age groups.

When it comes to sustainability, small details – like avoiding single-use plastics – can reflect your business’s sustainable choices in ways that could pay dividends. After all, 85 per cent of ANZ consumers expect companies to be environmentally conscious in all their advertising and communications.

Next step: Run a critical eye over your image and video library to see whether you feel it is representative and authentic, and whether it reflects your values when it comes to sustainability.

Move with the times and inspire hope

Life looks pretty different for many of us than it did a year ago. It’s no surprise that in the past year, iStock has seen a whopping 2157 per cent increase in searches for “working from home”, and a 590 per cent increase in “video conference”. It is critical that your content in 2021 is reflective of your customers’ reality.

Next step: Look for imagery that depicts authentic moments that balance what life is like today, with hopes for tomorrow.

By taking simple steps to ensure your content connects in a genuine way, your small business can set itself apart, broaden its customer base and drive growth.

Kate Rourke, Head of Creative Insights – APAC, iStock by Getty Images



Thank you for stopping by to visit My Local Pages and seeing this news update regarding Australian Business National and Political news called “2021 holds promise for small businesses – capitalise on it with compelling content”. This news release was brought to you by My Local Pages Australia as part of our local and national news services.

#holds #promise #small #businesses #capitalise #compelling #content



Source link