OAN obtains letter from DOJ trying to stop Ariz. audit


Maricopa County ballots cast in the 2020 general election are being examined and recounted by contractors working for Florida-based company, Cyber Ninjas, who was hired by the Arizona State Senate at Veterans Memorial Coliseum in Phoenix, Thursday, April 29, 2021. (Rob Schumacher/The Arizona Republic via AP, Pool)

OAN Newsroom
UPDATED 7:43 AM PT – Thursday, May 6, 2021

There’s breaking news out of Maricopa County, Arizona where Biden administration officials are attempting to insert themselves into the ongoing ballot audit despite lacking the authority to do so.

The Arizona election audit is no stranger to opposition and May 5 proved no exception. The civil rights division of the Department of Justice sent a letter to Arizona Senate President Karen Fann expressing concerns over the review.

The letter appears to be prompted by an April 30 letter from the Brennan Center, a far-left liberal group, to the Department of Justice asking them to intervene in the audit.

It appears the DOJ took the Brennan Center’s request to heart because their letter Wednesday asked for the state Senate’s “response to the concerns described herein, including advising us of the steps that the Arizona Senate will take to ensure that violations of federal law do not occur.”

The United States Constitution grants the power to oversee elections exclusively to state legislatures, meaning the federal government has no authority to interfere in the audit. The letter was fairly benign and only cited media reports as evidence.

The main issues raised were with regard to voting rights, especially for minority voters, and the security of the facility, both of which have been easily addressed by the Senate. In fact, the letter did not include a single piece of factual evidence on which the DOJ could base their concerns.

Further, Democrats have sued the Senate four times in an effort to stop the audit and have failed every time. The Department of Justice’s letter appeals to the exact same concerns as those raised in court, meaning the Senate has four court opinions that they can send to the DOJ to refute their claims and say their concerns are baseless at this time.

The fact that the DOJ sent the letter at all is odd given the strict constitutional differentiation from state and federal rights. It’s a strange appeal that comes across as a “hail Mary” from Democrats looking to impede the audit. Like all previous attempts, however, this is also unlikely to be successful.

A reporter watches the Maricopa County ballots cast in the 2020 general election being examined and recounted by contractors working for Florida-based company, Cyber Ninjas, who was hired by the Arizona State Senate at Veterans Memorial Coliseum in Phoenix, Thursday, April 29, 2021. (Rob Schumacher/The Arizona Republic via AP, Pool)

A reporter watches the Maricopa County ballots cast in the 2020 general election being examined and recounted by contractors working for Florida-based company, Cyber Ninjas, who was hired by the Arizona State Senate at Veterans Memorial Coliseum in Phoenix, Thursday, April 29, 2021. (Rob Schumacher/The Arizona Republic via AP, Pool)

MORE NEWS: Pollster: Americans Think Cancel Culture Has Gone Too Far



Thank you for visiting My Local Pages and seeing this post about the latest USA News items named “OAN obtains letter from DOJ trying to stop Ariz. audit”. This post is brought to you by MyLocalPages Australia as part of our local news services.

#OAN #obtains #letter #DOJ #stop #Ariz #audit



Source link

DOJ Budget Includes $85M Increase to Fight Domestic Terrorism



Attorney General Merrick Garland told House lawmakers Tuesday that the Biden Administration’s 2022 budget request for the Department of Justice (DOJ) would seek an $85 million increase from last year’s budget for domestic terrorism investigations and cases.

“Our budget supports my commitment to protecting our national security, including addressing both international and domestic terrorism while respecting civil liberties.” Garland testified to the House Appropriations Subcommittee on Commerce, Justice and Science. “It includes increases of $45 million for the FBI domestic terrorism investigations and $40 million for the U.S. attorneys to manage increasing domestic terrorism caseloads.”

The increase from last year’s budget for domestic terrorism cases comes as Democrats have sought to label Trump supporters who protested on January 6 at the Capitol as domestic terrorists, domestic violent extremists, and white supremacists. Committee Chairman Matt Cartwright (D-PA) said at the hearing the “attack on the Capitol” was an “unprecedented” threat from domestic violent extremism.

Garland testified during his confirmation hearing that his first priority as attorney general would be the investigation into January 6. So far, the DOJ has charged more than 400 people as part of that investigation.

Garland also said at Tuesday’s hearing the threat of domestic violent extremism and domestic terrorism keeps him up at night.

“My oath is to protect the Constitution and Americans from all enemies, both foreign and domestic,” he said. “And so both forms of terrorism are extraordinary concern to me. We never want to take our eyes off of what happened on 9/11 and that the risks that the country continues to face from foreign terrorist attacks on the homeland.”

“Likewise, we have a growing fear of domestic violent extremism and domestic terrorism and both of those keep me up at night…virtually every morning, I get a briefing from the FBI in one of the other or both areas,” he told the committee.

Committee Ranking Member Robert Aderholt (R-AL) pressed Garland on why the FBI classified the 2017 congressional baseball game shooting that targeted Republican members of Congress as a case of “suicide by cop” instead of domestic terrorism, despite the Department of Homeland Security and the Office of the Director of National Intelligence doing so, as previously reported by Breitbart News.

The attorney general said he had not yet had a chance to speak to the FBI about it and promised he would do so.

Garland also said the total budget request seeks to increase the DOJ’s civil rights funding by $33 million, for a total of $209 million for the civil rights division, the community relations service, and related civil rights work. The budget will also include a “historic investment of $1 billion” to support the department’s Office of Violence Against Women.

The DOJ budget request includes an increase of $304 million, for a total of $1.2 billion, for programs that support “community-oriented policing and addressing systemic inequities,” he said.

He also said funding to combat gun violence would increase by $232 million, for community violence intervention programs, to improve background checks, and for more comprehensive red flag laws.

Garland promised the DOJ would step up its work on environmental justice, asserting that “communities of color, low-income communities, and tribal communities often suffer the most harm from environmental crimes and pollution.”

Garland also requested a 21% budget increase for the Executive Office for Immigration Review that will pay for 100 new immigration judges, improved technology, and other “efficiency mechanisms” to reduce a backlog of nearly 1.3 million cases pending before immigration courts.

“I have mentioned only a few of the department’s important programs this morning. I ask your support for our budget as the entire department works to ensure adherence to the rule of law, protection and public safety, and equal justice for all Americans,” he testified.

Follow Breitbart News’s Kristina Wong on Twitter or on Facebook. 



Thank you for stopping by and checking out this news release about USA and International news called “DOJ Budget Includes $85M Increase to Fight Domestic Terrorism”. This news article was shared by MyLocalPages as part of our USA news services.

#DOJ #Budget #Includes #85M #Increase #Fight #Domestic #Terrorism



Source link

GOP senators grill Biden DOJ pick Vanita Gupta over attacks on GOP


Vanita Gupta spoke during a Senate Judiciary Committee hearing to examine her nomination to be Associate Attorney General, on Capitol Hill, Tuesday, March 9, 2021, in Washington. (AP Photo/Alex Brandon)

OAN Newsroom
UPDATED 7:20 PM PT – Sunday, March 14, 2021

Civil rights attorney Vanita Gupta is facing immense scrutiny from Republican senators over her apparent partisan career.

The Senate Judiciary Committee recently held a hearing to consider Gupta’s nomination for associate U.S. attorney general, the number three spot in the Department of Justice.

GOP committee members grilled Gupta over her progressive stances on several issues, including defunding police departments and trust-busting Big Tech companies.

They also wanted her to clarify her vitriolic rhetoric to Republican lawmakers and judges appointed by President Trump.

“She called the confirmation of now Supreme Court Justice Amy Coney Barrett ‘illegitimate.’ She called Judge Kavanaugh a ‘privileged lifelong partisan,’” Sen. Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa) stated.

Senate Judiciary Committee ranking member Chuck Grassley, of Iowa, speaks during hearing for Vanita Gupta, nominated to be Associate Attorney General, and Lisa Monaco nominated to be Deputy Attorney General, on Capitol Hill, Tuesday, March 9, 2021, in Washington. (AP Photo/Alex Brandon)

Senate Judiciary Committee ranking member Chuck Grassley of Iowa spoke during hearing for Vanita Gupta on Capitol Hill, Tuesday, March 9, 2021, in Washington. (AP Photo/Alex Brandon)

 

Republicans also took issue with Gupta’s seemingly flip-floppy stances on certain issues. Sen. Josh Hawley (R-Mo.) and Sen. Tom Cotton (R-Ark.) highlighted her previous position of decriminalizing all drugs, and her reversal leading up to her confirmation hearing.

Additionally, Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Texas) called out Gupta for saying she opposes defund the police rhetoric, despite advocating for it to Congress last year.

“Chairman Durbin asked you about abolishing the police and you said I do not support defunding the police, which is clearly the right political answer seeking to get confirmed,” Cruz said. “I would note that just a few months ago, last year in written correspondence with the Senate of the United States, you encouraged Congress to ‘reexamine federal spending priorities and shrink the footprint of the police and criminal legal system in this country.’”

However, Gupta said many changes in her policy stances came from working for the DOJ during the Obama administration. She claimed if confirmed, she would work hard to reach across the aisle and employ staffers with different political opinions.

In the meantime, the Senate Judiciary Committee has to vote to move forward Gupta’s nomination before the full Senate has a chance to confirm her nomination.

MORE NEWS: Dozens Shot, Few Dead In Weekend Chicago Violence



Thank you for spending your time with us on My Local Pages. We hope you enjoyed seeing this post regarding USA Business and Political news published as “GOP senators grill Biden DOJ pick Vanita Gupta over attacks on GOP”. This post is presented by MyLocalPages Australia as part of our local news services.

#GOP #senators #grill #Biden #DOJ #pick #Vanita #Gupta #attacks #GOP



Source link

Comey email reveals FBI, DOJ made ‘premeditated effort to dislodge’ Trump from office: Gaetz


The Justice Department and FBI engaged in a “premeditated effort to dislodge the duly elected president of the United States,” Rep. Matt Gaetz, R-Fla., charged Monday on “Hannity.”

Gaetz was responding to a report published earlier Monday by Just the News which revealed that on Jan. 12, 2017, then-FBI Director James Comey had emailed then-Director of National Intelligence James Clapper and said that the FBI was “not able to sufficiently corroborate the reporting” in the now-infamous Steele dossier. The email was sent the same day Comey signed a FISA surveillance warrant that declared Steele’s reporting as verified.

“Not only did our own Justice Department set up the president on the Russia hoax, they did it with rotten information and they knew the information was rotten when they did it.”

Despite this new evidence, Gaetz told host Sean Hannity it is unlikely the Biden administration will hold anyone to account.

JASON CHAFFETZ CALLS ON NANCY PELOSI TO ANSWER 13 QUESTIONS ABOUT CAPITOL HILL SECURITY

“You know, I know, and all of the viewers know that there’s not going to be accountability under the Biden Justice Department,” Gaetz alleged, “because none of the career people there think the way to move up in the Biden Justice Department is to expose the Russia hoax. Instead they’re going to be targeting the President [Trump], his family members and the supporters of the America First movement.”

Hannity, Gaetz and former House Oversight Committee chair Jason Chaffetz also discussed House Speaker Nancy Pelosi’s failure to secure the Capitol ahead of the Jan. 6 riot and the ongoing lockdown in the nation’s Capitol despite the lack of an ongoing threat.

“She’s been charge for years,” said Chaffetz, “She hasn’t learned how to protect herself, members of Congress, the Capitol complex. The National Guard was ready to go, why didn’t those things happen?

“The Speaker is running out of excuses,” Chaffetz added. “She has surrounded the United States Capitol with a fence and a wall, but at the same time Biden and the administration is getting rid of the wall on the Southern border.”

CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

“Let me caution against leaning too hard into the ‘What did Nancy Pelosi know and when did she know it?’ narrative,” Gaetz warned. “I don’t want to give the Democrats any more of a basis to be able to have this forever occupation of Washington, D.C.”

He added: “We now have a capital city wrapped in barbed wire, crisscrossed in barricades and it is not what our country deserves. So let’s not help Nancy Pelosi and the Democrats build a predicate for that extended occupation.”

Thanks for dropping by and seeing this news release on USA Business and Political news called “Comey email reveals FBI, DOJ made ‘premeditated effort to dislodge’ Trump from office: Gaetz”. This article was posted by My Local Pages Australia as part of our national news services.

#Comey #email #reveals #FBI #DOJ #premeditated #effort #dislodge #Trump #office #Gaetz



Source link

DOJ slams lawsuit that wants Pence to void Biden win for Trump


Rep. Louie Gohmert, R-Texas, and members of the House Freedom Caucus conduct a news conference to call on Attorney General William Barr to release findings of an investigation into allegations of 2020 election fraud, outside the Capitol on Thursday, December 3, 2020.

Tom Williams | CQ-Roll Call, Inc. | Getty Images

The Department of Justice on Thursday slammed a desperate Republican-led lawsuit to reverse President-elect Joe Biden’s Electoral College win, calling the case against Vice President Mike Pence “a walking legal contradiction.”

The DOJ said in a new court filing that Rep. Louis Gohmert, R-Texas, and 11 Arizona Republicans have “sued the wrong defendant” — Pence — in the case.

And top DOJ officials urged a judge to reject the request that he issue an emergency injunction that purportedly would empower Pence to ignore the Electoral College votes from a handful of battleground states who have given Biden his margin of victory over President Donald Trump.

Pence next week is scheduled to preside over Congress when it meets to certify Biden’s win.

Gohmert’s suit asks federal Judge Jeremy Kernodle, a Trump appointee in U.S. Court for the Eastern District of Texas, to declare that Pence has the “exclusive authority and sole discretion” to decide which electoral votes from a given state should be counted.

The Republicans ask Kernodle to deliver that power to Pence by striking down key sections of the 1887 Electoral Count Act, a law they claim contradicts the 12th Amendment.

Gohmert’s claim conflicts with legal experts who say that Pence’s role, or the role of any vice president, is to preside over the counting of the votes submitted by the Electoral College, not to judge which ones are valid or not.

Pence is the sole defendant in the case — a fact that John Coghlan, the deputy assistant attorney general for the DOJ’s civil division, highlighted as he argued against the injunction being issued.

“These plaintiffs’ suit is not a proper vehicle for addressing those issues because plaintiffs have sued the wrong defendant,” Coghlan wrote in a court filing.

“The Vice President — the only defendant in this case — is ironically the very person whose power they seek to promote,” Coghlan wrote.

“The Senate and the House, not the Vice President, have legal interests that are sufficiently adverse to plaintiffs to ground a case or controversy under Article III. Defendant respectfully request denial of plaintiffs’ emergency motion because the relief that plaintiffs request does not properly lie against the Vice President.”

Coghlan also suggested that if there was any proper target for Gohmert’s suit, it would be the House and Senate, not Pence.

“Indeed, as a matter of logic, it is those bodies against whom plaintiffs’ requested relief must run.”

Later Thursday, a lawyer for the House of Representatives filed his own brief, which urged Kernodle to dismiss the case.

“Setting aside Representative Gohmert’s claims — for which he clearly lacks standing — this case is simply another attempt by defeated Arizona electoral nominees to overturn the results of the popular vote in their state,” wrote Douglas Letter, general counsel for the House.

“The Arizona plaintiffs have tried and failed to overturn the election in suits they filed in federal and state courts in Arizona,” Letter wrote.

“Thus, they now ask this Court in Texas to help them achieve what they failed to do in Arizona. This Court should reject plaintiffs’ bid to overturn a cornerstone of our Nation’s democratic processes.”

The last-ditch Republican suit follows dozens of failed attempts from Trump’s campaign and his allies to have courts reverse or invalidate electoral votes for Biden.

Numerous House Republicans have supported some of those efforts, most notably a bid from Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton to have the U.S. Supreme Court cancel the results of four key swing states. The high court refused to hear that case.

Some Republican lawmakers are planning to contest the election results when Congress meets next Wednesday. Missouri Republican Josh Hawley this week became the first senator to take that step.

If one House member and one senator jointly object to a state’s slate of electors, the two chambers must separately debate and then vote on the objection.

Experts say there’s no real chance of overturning the outcome of the election. Pence has shown no indication that he will entertain those objections or otherwise seek to overturn the election.



Source link

Trump administration blocks funding for California, brings DOJ suit over abortion issues


The Trump administration announced two key actions Wednesday designed to protect entities that sought to avoid supporting abortion.

Both announcements addressed longstanding issues handled by the Department of Health and Human Services’ Office of Civil Rights. In a press release Wednesday, HHS said it would block $200 million in federal Medicaid funds slated for California “due to the state illegally mandating that all health care plans subject to regulation by the California Department of Managed Health Care (DMHC) cover abortion without exclusion or limitation.”

It also said it referred a case to the Justice Department involving a nurse who was allegedly forced to assist in an elective abortion. DOJ announced on Wednesday that it would bring a suit against the University of Vermont Medical Center over the issue.

“California and the University of Vermont Medical Center have violated federal conscience laws and refused to work with us to take corrective action, so we are now taking action to hold them to account,” HHS Secretary Alex Azar said.

CBS ‘ABORTION ACCESS’ REPORTER SLAMS ‘TONE DEAF’ PENCE FOR HOLDING PRO-LIFE EVENT DURING PANDEMIC

Roger Severino, who leads the department’s Office of Civil Rights, said: “Whatever one thinks of the legality of abortion, no one should be punished for declining to pay for or assist in the taking of human life.”

The University of Vermont (UVM) Medical Center did not immediately respond to Fox News’ request for comment. According to WCAX, the CBS television station in South Burlington, Vt., the medical center said it didn’t feel it had discriminated against the nurse involved.

Dr. Stephen Leffler, president and CEO of the UVM Medical Center, reportedly said: “I want to be very clear we are very sensitive to our employees’ religious and moral beliefs, and we believe are very confident that we have a policy that protects our employees’ rights while being certain to offer all legal and safe procedures for patients that seek our care.”

The decisions came at the end of an administration which anti-abortion advocates have touted as being led by the “most pro-life” president in U.S. history.

Vice President Mike Pence held a triumphant event earlier in the day, declaring that “life is winning.”

During his speech, he heralded the administration’s “great progress” on the issue and touted the president’s efforts to “save lives” during the coronavirus pandemic.

Gov. Gavin Newsom, D-Calif., mocked the “pro-life” label on Wednesday, tweeting that HHS’ decision came during a pandemic.

OVER 25 BLACK MINISTERS SIGN LETTER TO WARNOCK ON ABORTION

“Nothing like the ‘pro-life’ party eliminating healthcare during a GLOBAL PANDEMIC. California will survive without this $$ for now — but their frail, pathetic patriarchal system they are so desperate to protect won’t,” he said.

Despite that label, the administration has faced pressure from pro-life activists to do more with the limited time he has left.

Live Action’s Lila Rose and Center for Medical Progress founder David Daleiden recently called on the administration to do more in an op-ed titled, “Just Defund Planned Parenthood Already — Here’s How.”

Following Daleiden’s 2015 explosive undercover videos on Planned Parenthood, Congressional investigators sent referrals to the Obama administration regarding potential violations of fetal trafficking laws and the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA).

After Trump took office, the Justice Department reportedly opened an investigation into the matter and Congress has urged the DOJ to update them on the issue. With roughly a month before President-elect Biden’s inauguration, the Trump administration has not yet announced further action on those two issues. 

However, Biden has already announced his choice of California Attorney General Xavier Becerra to take over HHS — pending Senate confirmation. A number of Catholic and conservative organizations have already criticized the pick of Becerra for being a pro-choice advocate. This makes the likelihood that Trump’s agenda at HHS after Biden assumes office will not be realized.  

Becerra, like Biden, is a Roman Catholic. 

CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

According to WCAX, Vermont’s attorney general, T.J. Donovan, said the new lawsuit was baffling. 

“The idea that you’re going to file this type of lawsuit 35 days to go before there is a change in the administration where you will have a new attorney general, frankly, is baffling,” he said. 



Source link

New details released on DOJ subpoena into Hunter Biden business dealings


Joe Biden embraces his son Hunter Biden after addressing the nation from the Chase Center November 07, 2020 in Wilmington, Delaware. (Photo by Andrew Harnik-Pool/Getty Images)

OAN Newsroom
UPDATED 2:15 PM PT – Sunday, December 13, 2020

New incriminating information is coming to light in the probe into Democrat presidential nominee Joe Biden’s son.

According to Saturday’s reports, Hunter Biden received nearly $500,000 to sit on the board of Ukrainian gas company Burisma, but the money was never disclosed in his 2014 tax return.

The discovery only adds to the Justice Department’s investigation into Hunter, which has been ongoing since 2018, despite media silence on the matter.

On Wednesday, Hunter Biden confirmed the investigation into his tax returns after he was contacted by a U.S. attorney in Delaware. The subpoenas will not only be looking into his Burisma relationship, but also his various business dealings in China.

In the meantime, President Trump took aim at Attorney General William Barr for reportedly keeping quiet about the Hunter Biden probe.

The President argues Barr’s silence cost Republicans at the polls and enabled Joe Biden to lie on the debate stage, by saying he knew nothing about his son’s affairs.

President Trump also noted if Biden were to become president, Barr would “do nothing” and in turn, let partisan officials kill the investigation.

Moving forward, the President has reportedly expressed interest in appointing a special counsel to probe the November presidential election.

MORE NEWS: WSJ: AG William Barr Kept Hunter Biden Investigations Secret Before 2020

 





Source link

DOJ Opened Separate Probe into Hunter Biden’s Ukraine Dealings



The Department of Justice began investigating Hunter Biden’s foreign business dealings earlier this year after receiving information from President Donald Trump’s attorney, former New York City Mayor Rudy Giuliani, according to a new report.

The New York Times reported on Friday that Attorney General William Barr directed the United States Attorney for the Western District of Pennsylvania to vet information on the “Biden family” provided by Guiliani. The information provided to the DOJ purportedly dealt with Hunter Biden’s ties to Burisma Holdings, a Ukrainian natural gas conglomerate.

As Breitbart News has previously reported, Biden joined Burisma’s board of directors in April 2014, shortly after his father was tapped to be the Obama administration’s point man on Ukraine. Despite having no background in either eastern Europe or the energy industry, Biden was paid as much $83,000 per month for his services.

NBC News reported on Friday that Hunter Biden’s work for the company in 2014 alone netted him $400,000.

Hunter Biden’s appointment came as Burisma was actively courting western leaders to prevent scrutiny of its business practices. The same month that Biden was tapped for Burisma’s board, Mykola Zlochevsky, the firm’s founder, had his assets frozen in the United Kingdom on suspicion of money laundering. A Ukrainian official with ties to Zlochevsky admitted in October 2019 the only reason Biden received his appointment with Burisma was to “protect” the company from foreign scrutiny.

Zlochevsky eventually succeeded in having assets unfrozen by allegedly paying a $7 million bribe to Ukraine’s then-prosecutor general in December 2014, according to testimony Deputy Assistant Secretary of State George Kent delivered to Congress earlier this year. Kent, who was then serving as the deputy chief of mission in Ukraine, only became aware of Hunter Biden’s role with Burisma after the bribe was supposedly paid. At the time, Kent raised concerns with his superiors in the Obama-era State Department that the situation presented the perception of a conflict of interest.

It is in the context of Burisma and Zlochevsky’s legal troubles that the Biden family’s influence has aroused questions. Joe Biden, in particular, has faced scrutiny for demanding the Ukrainian government fire its top prosecutor, Viktor Shokin, in 2016. Shokin, who at the time had an open probe into Burisma and Zlochevsky, was eventually ousted after Joe Biden threatened to withhold more than $1 billion in U.S. loan guarantees.

The former vice president, who has publicly bragged about the firing, has claimed the demand came from then-President Barack Obama, who had allegedly lost faith in the prosecutor’s ability to tackle corruption.

It is unclear if the investigation that the U.S. Attorney for the Western District of Pennsylvania opened earlier this year deals directly with that topic. Furthermore, it is also uncertain if the investigation is still ongoing.

The Times’ report comes only days after Hunter Biden admitted that he had been informed by the U.S. Attorney for the District of Delaware that they had opened a separate probe into his “tax affairs.” Although the specifics of that probe remain unclear at the moment, sources indicate it is linked to income that Hunter Biden earned overseas through ventures in Ukraine and China.

Hunter Biden is not the only member of his family being eyed by federal law enforcement. Politico reported earlier this week that the U.S. Attorney for the Western District of Pennsylvania is also investigating Joe Biden’s younger brother, James, for his role in a now-bankrupt healthcare firm.



Source link

Trump news – live: DOJ sues Facebook as Ivanka hits out at ‘vindictive’ probe of her hotel work


National Review

The UAE Is Rejecting Doublethink on Israel — Will It Last?

A remarkable feature of the first months of peace between Israel and the United Arab Emirates (UAE) is the way the Emiratis have warmly embraced delegations representing Israel and American-Jewish communities. UAE leaders have urged their citizens to be hospitable and have largely been heeded. Will the popular warmth continue — or will it only last as long as this honeymoon period? This bears watching.Emirati officials appear to reject the doublethink on Israelis and Jews that is prevalent in Egypt and Jordan. They were the first Arab countries to make peace with the Jewish state but, in both, the population is intensely anti-Israel and anti-Jewish. Egypt reminded us of that last week when a court announced its readiness to hear a case against singer Mohamed Ramadan. His offense? Taking a selfie in Dubai with an Israeli pop star, Omer Adam.Ramadan is accused of “insulting the Egyptian people,” and he has been suspended from the syndicate of Egyptian artists. This in a country that has had full diplomatic relations with Israel since 1979 and whose officials currently enjoy trade relations, military cooperation, and intelligence sharing with the Jewish state. Indeed, for decades Egyptian society has demonized Jews. It is still a leading producer of anti-Semitic content in the Arab world. Today, Abdel Fatah al-Sisi’s government has, to some extent, revived Jewish heritage in Egypt by renovating synagogues and restoring Jewish cemeteries. Caricatures of Jews have also been largely (though not entirely) relegated to the margins of the entertainment industry. But the government’s ostensible goodwill toward the country’s few remaining Jews contrasts starkly with other open hostility toward Israelis, as demonstrated in the Ramadan affair.A similar dynamic persists in Jordan. Despite a 1994 peace treaty, Jordanian officials do not promote neighborly feelings toward the Jewish state or Jews. Its national curriculum endorses a “two-state solution” to the Israeli–Palestinian conflict, but schoolbook maps erase Israel, naming the entirety of the land west of the Jordan River “Palestine.” Zionism, the national movement of the Jewish people, is maligned as “racist colonialism.” One can buy an Arabic translation of Adolf Hitler’s Mein Kampf — with a book cover depicting a triumphant Hitler — at just about any bookstand in downtown Amman.Statements from Emirati officials, for now, embrace both Jews and Israelis, with Judaism honored as one of the region’s indigenous faiths. The planned Abrahamic Family House will host a mosque, a synagogue, and a church in Abu Dhabi. Abu Dhabi’s tourism ministry has instructed hotels to provide kosher food options for guests. The photo that landed Ramadan in hot water was first tweeted affirmatively by an Emirati journalist backed by his government.Egypt, Jordan, and the UAE are not democracies. But their rulers are sensitive to public opinion — and vice versa. Government statements help shape public opinion and also reflect it. It could be that in Egypt and Jordan, state-sanctioned anti-Semitism was meant to placate the parts of society upset by their government’s peace treaties with Israel. But the UAE’s leaders have made a different calculation. They are actively encouraging pro-Israel and pro-Jewish thinking among their people.Why are they doing this? They have an interest in building domestic public support for their peace policy and countering the propaganda of their Islamist enemies. They want to improve the Emirates’ standing abroad, especially in the United States. And they want to cultivate friendly relations with Israel, whose businessmen, technologists, and academics can help the UAE strengthen its security and diversify its economy.UAE leaders still have their work cut out for them. A poll taken since the signing of the Abraham Accords shows that only 46 percent of Emiratis have a favorable impression of Israel, but that is not bad when compared with 31 percent of Bahrainis, 23 percent of Saudis, and 16 percent of Moroccans. Two-thirds of Israelis look favorably on the UAE.The incoming Biden administration may see value in urging the Emiratis to maintain this course of promoting popular goodwill toward Israel and the Jews. Last month, a senior UAE official told a U.S. State Department conference that his country will lead the Middle East and that the world in countering anti-Semitism. This could prove influential in the Arab world, where anti-Jewish conspiracies abound and are widely believed. A UAE-led, Arabic-language campaign to counter Jew-hatred would promote shared U.S. and UAE interests in countering religious extremism in the Middle East.Sadly, since his selfie went viral, Ramadan said he would not have taken the photo if had known Adam was Israeli. He bowed to the mob, unlike the beauty queen — Miss Iraq — Sarah Idan, who was forced to flee her home country in 2017 after posting a selfie with Miss Israel. Idan has since visited Israel and remains friends with her Israeli former competitor.In not only making peace as a formal arrangement between governments, but also urging its people to adopt a friendly attitude toward Israel and the Jews, UAE leaders are leading a pioneering mission in the Arab world. They say that they view their country as a model for others in the Middle East. This will put the UAE’s influence — its so-called soft power — to the test. If it succeeds, the effects could positively transform the entire Middle East and the broader Muslim world.



Source link

Allies of President Trump concerned DOJ will not conduct meaningful investigation into voter fraud



TOPSHOT – US Attorney General William Barr arrives for a press conference. (Photo by BRENDAN SMIALOWSKI/AFP via Getty Images)

OAN Newsroom
UPDATED 7:15 PM PT – Wednesday, December 2, 2020

Allies of the President are calling on the Justice Department to step up efforts to investigate election fraud.

On Wednesday, Rep. Andy Biggs (R-Ariz.) told One America News that while he’s optimistic the Department of Justice will conduct a thorough review, he’s still a little cynical.

President Trump’s campaign continues to maintain that it has evidence of voter fraud in at least six key states despite recent comments by Attorney General William Barr.

Biggs also noted shortcomings by the Justice Department, which have prompted concerns about its ability to fulfill its duty.

“We’ve expected the Durham report for a year now… and we never got it,” Biggs said. “They’re not out there really busting things to break this thing down to try to resolve some of these issues.”

He added that although we’re seeing more specific allegations, affidavits and evidence, there is still no proof that the attorney general is actively investigating these incidents.

Biggs mentioned he hopes the search for evidence of voter fraud continues. He noted that audits would help determine if further remedies are needed.

Meanwhile, political consultant Roger Stone also took aim at Barr, calling him “part of the deep state.”

In a video Tuesday, Stone claimed Barr is blocking the nation’s two-tiered justice system. This came after Barr’s remarks, which claim the Justice Department found no substantial voter fraud thus far.

Stone went on to cite Barr’s failure to prosecute former FBI Director James Comey as well as former Deputy Director Andrew McCabe.

Additionally, Stone criticized the ongoing ‘Durham’ probe by calling it a ploy.


Stone said there is overwhelming and compelling evidence of voter fraud in the election despite Barr’s claims.

RELATED: Whistleblowers Testify To Fraud In Battleground States

 

The post Allies of President Trump concerned DOJ will not conduct meaningful investigation into voter fraud first appeared on One America News Network.





Source link