We all have a friend (or maybe we are that friend) who finishes their meal in about 10 seconds flat. It’s as if they’re competing to scarf their food down faster than anyone else at the table.
Regardless of how hungry you might be, there’s ample research to demonstrate the importance of fully chewing your food before you swallow it.
In fact, adequate chewing just might be the key to getting a chiseled jaw, a leaner physique, and improving your digestion. So let’s dig in.
The Recipe for a Weak Jaw & Double Chin
A sculpted jaw is highly sought after by bodybuilders, celebs, and people who just want to be pretty. But jaw strength is about more than just aesthetics. In an era where soft foods and liquid calories are common, the answer is clear: you need to prioritize solid food and chew it well.
Food scientists have engineered our food to be softer, which requires less chewing. Think about the staples in a standard American diet: chips, cereals, breads, candy, etc. Even healthier foods like eggs don’t require a whole lot of chewing.
As we shift away from eating tougher foods, like meat, fibrous vegetables, and tubers, our jaws continue to get narrower, weaker, and softer. If we keep trending in this direction, all our future generations will have tiny jaws and double chins.
Chewing tough foods requires the activation of several muscles and bones of the face that’d otherwise become flaccid. If you want a nice jaw, you have to chew.
This doesn’t mean taking 3-5 bites of a food and then gulping it down—it means 30-50 chews until you’ve broken the food up into small enough pieces to swallow with ease.
If you rush through your meal, you’re missing out on hundreds of extra “reps” to build muscles like the masseter, temporalis, medial pterygoid, and lateral pterygoid. These muscles consist mostly of slow twitch fibers, which means you want to accumulate lots of volume.
You could even buy a tough chewing gum to continue to engage these muscles. (Just don’t go overboard because chewing all day could cause jaw pain and even arthritis in the mandible.)
The First Step in Digestion
It’s chewing. And doing it properly helps your body produce the necessary digestive enzymes to break down the food you’re preparing to swallow. It also triggers the production of hydrochloric acid and saliva to guide food through the digestive tract.
Digestive enzymes are proteins that effectively signal the other systems in the body that you’re consuming food, and they begin to break down those food particles as they enter the stomach.
Different types of enzymes are responsible for breaking down different types of foods: amylases help you digest carbs, lipases facilitate the digestion of fats, and proteases are responsible for breaking down proteins. There are several other types of digestive enzymes, each of which is released in a different area of the body – the mouth, the pancreas, the stomach, and the small intestine.
The longer we chew, the lighter the load on the esophagus, the easier it is for these various enzymes to do their jobs, which creates less work for the stomach.
How Chewing Affects Caloric Intake
Several studies have shown an inverse relationship between chewing duration and calorie intake during a given meal. One study compared the chewing habits of lean and obese individuals. At baseline, obese subjects consumed more food overall and relied on fewer chews per gram of food consumed than the lean subjects.
Researchers compared differences in overall calorie consumption during a meal and subsequent ghrelin (a hormone that increases the appetite) between subjects who chewed 15 times per bite and 40 times per bite.
The group who chewed 40 times ate fewer total calories (nearly 12% fewer) and had a lower concentration of ghrelin.
Did you catch that? Those who chewed the most ate the least and felt more satiated after the meal than those who only chewed each bite 15 times (Li et. al. 2011).
Have you ever eaten a huge meal and still felt hungry afterwards? You may have just eaten it too quickly.
The Thermic Effect of Chewing
In addition to improving your satiety while eating, fully chewing your meals can boost the thermic effect of the foods you eat. A study conducted in Japan concluded that fast eating actually decreases the thermic effect of food (TEF). Think of this effect as the calories required to digest the food you’re eating.
So if you eat a meal rapidly, your body doesn’t expend as many calories digesting the food compared to eating slowly (Tomaya et. al. 2015). Scientists estimate that 10-20% of your daily calorie expenditure comes from the thermic effect of food, so chewing more thoroughly could actually have a significant effect on metabolic rate in the long term.
Another study testing young, healthy subjects suggests that slow chewing increases energy expenditure per cycle compared with faster chewing. This study tested the rate of gum chewing compared with caloric demands.
Researchers compared 6-minute sessions of slow gum chewing (∼60 cycles/min) and fast chewing (∼120 cycles/min). Surprisingly, the slow chewing group utilized significantly more calories over the course of the 6-minute window than the fast-chewing group. Thus, slower chewing may positively influence the overall daily metabolic rate (Paphangkorakit et. al. 2014).
Rest and Digest
As a personal trainer, I hear an increasingly large number of clients complain of digestive issues. From IBS, to constipation, to acid reflux, digestive issues can lead to physical discomfort and further health complications. If you suffer from any type of gastrointestinal issues, increasing chewing duration may be one way to help improve your digestion.
“Splanchnic circulation” is a scientific term for blood flow to the gastrointestinal tract, liver, spleen, and pancreas. One particular study found an inverse relationship between chewing duration and splanchnic circulation.
Measurements of the diameters of two major arteries and the blood velocities within them showed that there was greater blood flow to those organs after meals with slower chewing rates (Hamada et. al. 2014). I’m sure you won’t be surprised to hear that areas of the body with greater blood flow typically function more efficiently.
In one analysis of IBS patients, researchers sought to examine different lifestyle contributors (meal regularity, breakfast skipping, chewing sufficiency, spicy and fried food intake, and tooth loss) and their effects on symptoms.
One of the key findings was that “there was a significant positive relationship between a lower chewing sufficiency (in individuals who did not chew all foods) and the risk of IBS.” It seems that chewing rate and efficiency has a notable effect on symptom severity in this population.
To optimize digestion, it’s important to chew your food efficiently.
Speed Eating Is Not Your Friend
No matter how famished you may feel, don’t rush through your meal! Not only will you truly savor the taste of your food—you’ll also improve body composition, jaw strength, and digestion.
This small lifestyle intervention can have a myriad of downstream health benefits. Take your time, chew your food thoroughly, and eat mindfully.
- Algera, J., Colomier, E., & Simrén, M. (2019). The dietary management of patients with irritable bowel syndrome: a narrative review of the existing and emerging evidence. Nutrients, 11(9), 2162.
- Fukuda, H., Saito, T., Mizuta, M., Moromugi, S., Ishimatsu, T., Nishikado, S., … & Konomi, Y. (2013). Chewing number is related to incremental increases in body weight from 20 years of age in Japanese middle-aged adults. Gerodontology, 30(3), 214-219.
- Hamada, Y., Kashima, H., & Hayashi, N. (2014). The number of chews and meal duration affect diet-induced thermogenesis and splanchnic circulation. Obesity, 22(5), E62-E69.
- Knoff, L. (2010). The Whole-Food Guide to Overcoming Irritable Bowel Syndrome: Strategies and Recipes for Eating Well With IBS, Indigestion, and Other Digestive Disorders. New Harbinger Publications.
- Li, J., Zhang, N., Hu, L., Li, Z., Li, R., Li, C., & Wang, S. (2011). Improvement in chewing activity reduces energy intake in one meal and modulates plasma gut hormone concentrations in obese and lean young Chinese men–. The American journal of clinical nutrition, 94(3), 709-716.
- Paphangkorakit, J., Leelayuwat, N., Boonyawat, N., Parniangtong, A., & Sripratoom, J. (2014). Effect of chewing speed on energy expenditure in healthy subjects. Acta Odontologica Scandinavica, 72(6), 424-427.
- Pedroni-Pereira, A., Araujo, D. S., de Oliveira Scudine, K. G., de Almeida Prado, D. G., Lima, D. A. N. L., & Castelo, P. M. (2016). Chewing in adolescents with overweight and obesity: An exploratory study with behavioral approach. Appetite, 107, 527-533.
- Pennings, B., Groen, B. B., van Dijk, J. W., de Lange, A., Kiskini, A., Kuklinski, M., … & Van Loon, L. J. (2013). Minced beef is more rapidly digested and absorbed than beef steak, resulting in greater postprandial protein retention in older men. The American journal of clinical nutrition, 98(1), 121-128.
- Rémond, D., Machebeuf, M., Yven, C., Buffière, C., Mioche, L., Mosoni, L., & Mirand, P. P. (2007). Postprandial whole-body protein metabolism after a meat meal is influenced by chewing efficiency in elderly subjects. The American journal of clinical nutrition, 85(5), 1286-1292.
- Schnepper, R., Richard, A., Wilhelm, F. H., & Blechert, J. (2019). A combined mindfulness–prolonged chewing intervention reduces body weight, food craving, and emotional eating. Journal of consulting and clinical psychology, 87(1), 106.
- Tasaka, A., Tahara, Y., Sugiyama, T., & Sakurai, K. (2008). Influence of chewing rate on salivary stress hormone levels. Nihon Hotetsu Shika Gakkai Zasshi, 52(4), 482-487.
- Toyama, K., Zhao, X., Kuranuki, S., Oguri, Y., Kashiwa, E., Yoshitake, Y., & Nakamura, T. (2015). The effect of fast eating on the thermic effect of food in young Japanese women. International Journal of Food Sciences and Nutrition, 66(2), 140-147.
- Zhu, Y., Hsu, W. H., & Hollis, J. H. (2013). Increasing the number of masticatory cycles is associated with reduced appetite and altered postprandial plasma concentrations of gut hormones, insulin and glucose. British Journal of Nutrition, 110(2), 384-390.