What Good Is the Russia-India-China Triangle for Moscow? – The Diplomat


India announced on August 30 that it will not participate in the Kavkaz-2020 military exercise to be held under the aegis of the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO) — a Eurasian multilateral grouping led by China and Russia, which also has Pakistan as a member – in southern Russia. While the official reason New Delhi provided for this decision was difficulties associated with the COVID-19 pandemic, Indian sources have pointed out that the country decided to skip Kavkaz-2020 due to the participation of the Chinese military in the exercises. India and China are in the middle of a tense standoff since early May this year in eastern Ladakh.

India’s decision to stay out of the Kavkaz-2020 once again brings to question why India decided to join the SCO  – or why it has accorded notional importance to groupings like BRICS as well as the Russia-India-China (RIC) trilateral – in the first place even as it deepens its strategic relationship with the United States and allied powers in the Indo-Pacific.

Writing in The Diplomat in January this year, Krzysztof Iwanek assessed the costs and benefits of India’s SCO membership. But what many fail to appreciate at a first glance is how contingent, historically speaking, arrangements such as the SCO, BRICS or RIC have been for Russia on its relationship with the West as it sought to first align itself with that bloc immediately after the end of the Cold War and then pivot away from it and rebrand itself as an Asian power.

In the Russian thinking about its role in the post-Cold War world, Moscow would emerge as an equal to the United States and be accorded commensurate importance. Building bridges with the West became a key project of Russian President Boris Yeltsin’s first foreign minister, the liberal Andrei Kozyrev. Oddly enough, Russia’s brief flirtation with liberalism did not extend to the world’s largest democracy. As Rajan Menon writes of this period: “Russian leaders did not regard India as critical to their country’s wider interests; they saw the United States, Europe, and China as the loci of economic and political power. The alignment with India seemed relic of the communist past.”

For a variety of reasons best explained by Russia’s status-seeking behavior, Moscow was to soon turn its back to the West and toward Asia, the calculation in the Kremlin being that such a reorientation would restore Russia’s former position in the international system. A fundamentally key step in this direction was the visit by Yeltsin’s second foreign minister, Yevgeny Primakov, to New Delhi in 1998 where he first floated the concept of the RIC to balance U.S. power while, in the backdrop, NATO continued to bomb Serbia without waiting for Moscow’s nod. RIC would become the political nucleus for BRICS — a grouping that takes reforms of key multilateral institutions to reflect the interests of the non-western world as a key task — in due time. (Ironically enough, the very fact that Russia was proposing balancing coalitions such as RIC was, in effect, an implicit admission that Russia was no longer a great power which could take on American unilateralist impulses on its own.)

Enjoying this article? Click here to subscribe for full access. Just $5 a month.

Following the Yeltsin years, despite Putin’s early optimism about a possible entente with the West, he increasingly began to present his country as a leader of the “non-West.” As early as June 2001, he was hedging his bets when it came to cultivating closer ties with the U.S. That month, the SCO was created, building on the Shanghai Five arrangement of 1996, with Russia, China, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, and Uzbekistan – as the sixth entrant — as founding members. India and Pakistan became full members of the grouping in 2017.

Together with Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov, Putin’s programmatic vision for a “non-West” with Russian leadership revolved around BRICS, RIC as well as the SCO. But suspicions between Russia and China, fueled by history as well as power asymmetries, never quite faded away from the scene. Therefore, the only way Moscow could advance its normative agenda of “multipolarity” by borrowing Chinese heft, so to speak, through alternative institutions and groupings was by bringing India in as a “balancing” force within them.

But as Stanislaw Skarzynski and Daniel Wong recently wrote in these pages, cracks in the Russia-China relationship are beginning to show and there is a small though distinct possibility that Moscow might seek to pivot back to the West. And this is where India could serve as a valuable link to the United States — and the Indian decision to persuade Russia to accept the Indo-Pacific construct finds its proper context. New Delhi is keenly aware of how Moscow’s quest for status in the international system has, in the past, led it to instrumentally partner with China and how, because of the same reason, it can also jettison Beijing in the future.



Source link

Josh Hill admits to baby love triangle rift


Former AFL player Josh Hill has reportedly admitted he is involved in a baby love-triangle drama with two women.

The 31-year-old former West Coast and Western Bulldogs star this month fathered two children to different women in Melbourne and Perth in a five-day span.

Hill, however, has only publicly celebrated one of his new children, posting glowing images on Facebook of him holding his new daughter, Noa, with fiance Jo Duffy on August 8.

He is yet to post any images of him with his other new daughter, Mila Grace, with former girlfriend Kara Wicks. Mila Grace is believed to have been born on August 13.

The full extent of his situation became public when his Wikipedia page was updated. “2020 has been a big year for Hill, becoming a father for the first time … two children born in the same week to two different women,” it read.

According to The Daily Mail, Hill has confirmed both children are his.

However, he has denied claims he and Wicks were a couple, saying they only ever had a “casual” relationship.

“She knew at this point that I was in a relationship and expecting a baby,’ Hill said in the report.

“It was a mistake having sex with this girl, and I’m spending every day making it up to my partner.

“It was a casual arrangement, which I stupidly didn’t stop straight away.”

His claims are disputed by a friend of Wicks’ in the report with the unidentified friend claiming Hill and Wicks even had a long distance relationship following his return to Melbourne.

Hill says he will “honour his responsibilities” with Wicks and his daughter, who are both in Perth.

Hill is still based in Melbourne with Duffy, where he coaches the St Albans Saints football club.

The ex-Eagle was delisted by the club at the end of the 2017 AFL season — forcing him into retirement at the age of 28.

Hill played 107 games with the Eagles after being traded from the Western Bulldogs, where he earlier played 66 senior games.

Hill is also the second cousin of St Kilda star Bradley Hill and Fremantle’s Stephen Hill.



Source link